This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Huang, P. C. C. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

China's Neglected Informal Economy

Reality and Theory

People's University of China University of California, Los Angeles

The informal economy—defined as workers who have no security of employment, receive few or no benefits, and are often unprotected by labor laws—in China today accounts for 168 million of the 283 million urban employed, but the official statistical apparatus in China still does not gather systematic data on the informal economy. Part of the reason for the neglect is the misleading influence of mainstream economic and sociological theories, which have come from the "economic dualism," "three-sector hypothesis," and "olive-shaped" social structure theories that held great influence in the United States in the 1960s. This article reviews the core elements of that modernization model, the "revolution" in development economics that followed in the 1970s and 1980s, and the "counterrevolution" from neoclassical economics that came with the rising ideological tide of neoconservatism. The article argues for a balanced theoretical perspective that can more appropriately capture the realities of the informal economy today.

Key Words: statistical data • economic dualism • informal economy • development economics • neoclassical economics • social justice

Modern China, Vol. 35, No. 4, 405-438 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0097700409333158


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?