This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Huang, P. C. C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Whither Chinese Law?

People's University of China and UCLA

Current Chinese debates about "modernity" focus on what Chinese law was and is, and where it should go from here; this article argues that the answer should be sought in historical processes involved in the pursuit of modern ideals—such as scientific knowledge, industrial development, and citizen rights—and not in any one theory or ideology. The essay attempts to excavate from the past century's history of Chinese legal practice components of what might be considered Chinese modernity, with examples from such major areas of civil law as inheritance-old age support, property rights, torts, and divorce. In addition, it emphasizes the court mediation system created by the Chinese Communist Party and the "practical moralism" mode of thinking evident in both imperial and modern Chinese lawmaking, pointing out the many commonalities they share with the current "alternative dispute resolution" movement of the West and with the legal pragmatism tradition of modern American law. The proper direction of development of Chinese law lies neither simply in importing the formalist rights laws of the West nor simply in relying on the practical moralism of China's past but rather, and properly so, in their long-term coexistence, competition, division of labor, and mutual influence.

Key Words: modernity • theory vs. practice • historical process • formalism • pragmatism • inheritance-old age support • tort law • dian • divorce • practical moralism • alternative dispute resolution

Modern China, Vol. 33, No. 2, 163-194 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0097700406298005


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				X. He Routinization of Divorce Law Practice in China: Institutional Constraints' Influence on Judicial Behaviour Int J Law Policy Family, April 1, 2009; 23(1): 83 - 109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. C. C. Huang Introduction to "The Nature of the Chinese State: Dialogues among Western and Chinese Scholars, I" Modern China, January 1, 2008; 34(1): 3 - 8. [PDF]