Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Modern China
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Political Trust in Rural China

Lianjiang Li

Hong Kong Baptist University

This article shows that while some Chinese villagers see the state as monolithic, more believe that there are substantial differences between the central and local governments. Among those who perceive a divided state, most appear to have more trust in higher levels than in lower levels and distinguish between the intent and the capacity of the central government ("the Center"). They trust that the Center’s intent is beneficent but distrust its capacity to ensure faithful implementation of its policies. The article concludes that the central state has some breathing space because dissatisfaction with lower levels does not immediately generate demands for fundamental political reforms; in addition, the combination of trust in the Center’s intent and distrust in its capacity may encourage villagers to defy local officials in the name of the Center. If villagers’ rightful resistance fails, total disillusionment with the Center may set in, resulting in cynicism or radicalism.

Key Words: Political trust • peasant • protest

Modern China, Vol. 30, No. 2, 228-258 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0097700403261824
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 China InformationHome page
J. J. Kennedy
State Capacity and Support for Village Institutions in Rural Shaanxi
China Information, November 1, 2009; 23(3): 383 - 410.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Modern ChinaHome page
Jie Chen, Chunlong Lu, and Yiyin Yang
Popular Support for Grassroots Self-Government in Urban China: Findings from a Beijing Survey
Modern China, October 1, 2007; 33(4): 505 - 528.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Prog Hum GeogrHome page
J. T. Murphy
Building Trust in Economic Space
Progress in Human Geography, August 1, 2006; 30(4): 427 - 450.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Comparative Political StudiesHome page
M. Manion
Democracy, Community, Trust: The Impact of Elections in Rural China
Comparative Political Studies, April 1, 2006; 39(3): 301 - 324.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Comparative Political StudiesHome page
K. J. O'Brien and L. Li
Popular Contention and its Impact in Rural China
Comparative Political Studies, April 1, 2005; 38(3): 235 - 259.
[Abstract] [PDF]